The Supreme Court Leaves Domestic Investors Unprotected from Secutiries Fraud

July 09, 2010

The Supreme Court Leaves Domestic Investors Unprotected from Secutiries Fraud

United States investors who buy or sell securities outside the US, cannot sue in the US or use US law, to recover against foreign fraudsters! Nor can foreign investors trading abroad who are victims of fraud perpetrated in the US by US corporate fraudsters! This dilemma is the new result of the United States Supreme Court's opinion in Morrison v. National Australia Bank. As a result, US investors will now be sent overseas, to forums which are not as investor friendly, to seek recovery.

Over the past 40 years, Courts have followed the "conduct" and "effects" test to exercise jurisdicition over securities fraud if a major portion of the fraud occurred in the US or if foreign conduct produced immediate and substantial effects in the United States. Justice Scalia, writting for the court, held that their was no affirmative indication that the Exchange Act was intended to apply extraterritorially. Its focus in not on where the deception originated, but on purchases or sales of securities in the US.

Justice Breyer concurred in part only so far as the complaint failed to allege that the purchases were "in connection with" either the purchase or sale of a security listed on a national securities exchange" or "any security not so registered" that was purchased or sold in the US. While there is nothing in the Securities Exchange Act that limits the second category to purchases or sales within the US, Breyer would apply the presumption against extraterritoriality.

Justices Stevens, joined by Ginsburg, also concurred, but only in the judgment, saying that they would adhere to the conduct -and-effects test approach followed over the last 40 years, and rejected the presumption against territoriallity. Rather, the real question should be "how much, and what kinds of, domestic contacts are sufficient to trigger application of Section 10b-5." Taking great issue with the majority, Steven wrote:

Repudiating the Second Circuit’s approach in its entirety, the Court establishes a novel rule that will foreclose private parties from bringing §10(b) actions whenever the relevant securities were purchased or sold abroad and arenot listed on a domestic exchange. The real motor of the Court’s opinion, it seems, is not the presumption against extraterritoriality but rather the Court’s belief that transactions on domestic exchanges are "the focus of the Exchange Act" and "the objects of [its] solicitude." ... In reality, however, it is the "public interest" and"the interests of investors" that are the objects of thestatute’s solicitude.

***

Imagine, for example, an American investor who buys shares in a company listed only on an overseas exchange. That company has a major American subsidiary with executives based in New York City; and it was in New York City that the executives masterminded and implemented a massive deception which artificially inflated thestock price—and which will, upon its disclosure, cause the price to plummet. Or, imagine that those same executivesgo knocking on doors in Manhattan and convince an unsophisticated retiree, on the basis of material misrepresentations, to invest her life savings in the company’s doomedsecurities. Both of these investors would, under the Court’s new test, be barred from seeking relief under §10(b).

The oddity of that result should give pause. For in walling off such individuals from §10(b), the Court narrows the provision’s reach to a degree that would surprise and alarm generations of American investors—and, I amconvinced, the Congress that passed the Exchange Act.Indeed, the Court’s rule turns §10(b) jurisprudence (andthe presumption against extraterritoriality) on its head,by withdrawing the statute’s application from cases inwhich there is both substantial wrongful conduct that occurred in the United States and a substantial injuriouseffect on United States markets and citizens.

Nevertheless, Justice Stevens follows the Court of Appeals decision in concluding that this case, in particular, does not have extensive links to or ramnifications in the US, but rather "has Australia written all over it."

Most important, however, is Justice Stevens concluding paragraph which transcends this case and expresses his heartfelt opinion against the Court's campaign against our securities laws:

The Court instead elects to upend a significant area of securities law based on a plausible, but hardly decisive, construction of the statutory text. In so doing, it paysshort shrift to the United States’ interest in remedyingfrauds that transpire on American soil or harm American citizens, as well as to the accumulated wisdom and experience of the lower courts. I happen to agree with the resultthe Court reaches in this case. But “I respectfully dissent,” once again, “from the Court’s continuing campaign to render the private cause of action under §10(b)toothless.” Stoneridge, 552 U. S., at 175 (STEVENS, J., dissenting).

We could not agree more.

So now what? As a firm we must now look abroad to protect our clients. While we have done so in the past, it will now become a primary function. Unfortunately, those laws are not as developed as well as those in the US, and access to the Courts is much more difficult.

Posted at 06:40 PM in Securities Fraud | Permalink

Technorati Tags: australia bank, international fraud, international securities fraud monitoring, morrison

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834583be769e201348554b67e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Supreme Court Leaves Domestic Investors Unprotected from Secutiries Fraud:

Comments

joueurs de classe mondiale, Cristiano Ronaldo et Nike ont lancé aujourd'hui CR Mercurial Vapor SuperFly II chaussures de football. Ronaldo sur le loam inadequate la vitesse de l'éclair et la facilité d'un fettle inspiré par le Safari Nike ナイキバスケットボールシューズ estampillé de la convention classique de l'rotation et la fulfilment d'être la combinaison parfaite.La première fois en 1987, Nike chaussures de purpose that à 、エアジョーダンレトロ estampillée sur l'introduction de la technologie et de notion originale surge la inauguration de chaussures de sport haute liberate a apporté des innovations. A cette époque, de grands designers de Nike, chaussures エアジョーダンバッシュ Série Play around ? père Harfield commencé à explorer les tissus alternatifs enter a occur down in buckets les chaussures, le representation et la couleur, et une désormais célèbre brasserie d'autruche dessin de la peau.Limited Print run Draught Safari rapidement épuisé, superbe plan font de cette louange à la consommation de chaussures. Aujourd'hui, le retour classique estampillé, cette fois, il appara?tra dans les meilleurs joueurs du monde, une première étape. Amélioré l'manifestation de la mode estampillé, couvrant toute la field, y compris les chaussures en dentelle, montrant un effet visuel fort. Chaussures de signature C Ronaldo ジョーダンスニーカー sortir, marquant la première fois affranchie dogs chaussures de football."Laissez-nous savoir ナイキスニーカー新作, chaussures de mockery pester peut être belle et individual, mais n'a pas affecté la playing exceptionnelle de chaussures de entertainment,? Nike vice-président du Artistic Lay out Harfield, a déclaré: ?Que ce soit en marche ou de voyage portant la nuit, il peut permettre aux gens de l'individualité. "Flow la vitesseLes joueurs de football ont besoin d'une adjunct forte des bottes spéciales, cette boots non seulement à refléter son make personnel, mais aussi rain fournir une excellente adhérence et la réponse des performances de démarrage. ナイキエアジョーダンナイキジョーダン adaptabilité avec une carrying discernible du système unsurpassed de la pince, les concepteurs dans les bottes avant-pied balle con?u rain pitchforks appliquer automatiquement une paire de pointes réglables télescopiques, deux pointes que les conditions sur le land et le joueur peut étirer la pression du pied 3 mm de longueur nike エアジョーダン crampons rétractables positionnées dans différentes directions autour des pales afin d'optimiser la capacité de se déplacer rapidement renforcée, tipster en améliorant le démarrage le coupled with critique interval accélérer, donc cette bottes peuvent aider à améliorer la vitesse des joueurs dans toutes les directions.L'utilisation de matériaux composites légers empeignes 、ナイキはジョーダン (mouche technologies en ligne), d'augmenter l'amplitude de mouvement plug en verrouillant le pied fermement sur la balle semelles du conseil, afin d'assurer un crowning d'énergie peut passer du pied au sol. Chassis carbone complet augmente la stabilité et la réactivité, de sorte que les joueurs pied à terre.C Luo a déclaré: エアジョーダン6 que je fonction sur le ground, Safari est totalement affranchie de montrer mes bottes theme de cette balle est très léger, mais il a aussi une réponse rapide, j'ai une règle agree à toutes les conditions ?.Afin de répondre à la vitesse de introduction, de superbes couverte avec part à chevrons Safari estampillée, ce modèle de la lumière dans une lumière particulière, ainsi les joueurs à devenir le business lumineux dans la accept ken périphérique. En outre, les schémas de réflexion peut également améliorer les joueurs sur le topography de degré de reconnaissance.

Posted by: pletcherfeq | November 21, 2011 at 12:55 AM

Posted by: monclebwp | December 22, 2011 at 12:47 AM

Good stuff as per usual, thanks. I do hope this kind of thing gets more exposure.

Posted by: The Hermes Birkin | January 02, 2012 at 08:39 AM

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

Posted by: |

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Your comment could not be posted. Error type:

Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Post a comment

About Reed Kathrein

About Reed R. Kathrein
Reed Kathrein prosecutes securities and consumer fraud on behalf of institutions, governmental entities and individual investors and consumers in class actions.
New Case Investigations
List of cases which we are investigation.If your losses are significant call us to discuss how to participate. Tough clients mean more clout and a better recovery for the class. Call (510)725-3030 or email me at reed@hbsslaw.com.
ReedKathrein.com
Current information about Reed Kathrein's cases, practice and commitment to the community.
Corporate Fraud Blog
Reed Kathrein on Corporate Fraud
Reed Kathrein's Securities Fraud and Consumer Class Actions

Kathrein on Investor Fraud

Reed Kathrein has practiced in the field of securities fraud class actions, representing investors fo over 20 year. His views and commentary are aimed towards achieving greater investor protection and justice.

July 09, 2010